Clausewitz and Sartre

This blog is titled On Genocide partly in reflection of Jean Paul Sartre’s 1967 article “On Genocide”. Much as I might disagree with some of Sartre’s contentions, it must be admitted that subsequent events only served to strengthen his central thesis. Beyond that, I would contend that his approach of seeking to use a fundamental understanding of genocide as a phenomenon as a basis for analysis is essential to any productive discourse. This is, sadly, the antithesis of the contemporary genocide discourse which seeks first to destroy fundamental meaning and significance.

Download pdf of Sartre’s “On Genocide”

Another influence on the name is Carl von Clausewitz and his work On War. Clausewitz is just one theorist, but he is representative of the common underlying conception of war. He gave a theoretical and coherent shape to what was and still is commonly considered to be “war”, a matter of sovereign against sovereign and military against military. When war is discussed it is always implicit or explicit that there is contestation between forces. Hence if military coercion is used against a populace which does not pose a military threat it is not considered war and one should not take Clausewitz’s conception of “absolute war” as somehow breaking that very real barrier.

Lemkin wrote: “Genocide is the antithesis of the Rousseau-Portalis Doctrine, which may be regarded as implicit in the Hague Regulations. This doctrine holds that war is directed against sovereigns and armies, not against subjects and civilians. In its modern application in civilized society, the doctrine means that war is conducted against states and armed forces and not against populations.” I use “Clausewitzian War” as a shorthand for this conception of war, and I’m not the only person who does so. It is a very convenient way of contrasting with genocide, and, indeed other forms of mass armed violence which are not “military” as we are led to conceive “military”.

Clausewitz – On War

5 thoughts on “Clausewitz and Sartre

  1. I appreciate the work you’re doing here. I don’t know much about your background but, based on your website and audio, I believe that you would be a worthwhile interviewee for somebody such as Eric Draitser or Peter B. Collins (preferrably not one of the countless nutballs out there (examples excluded so as not to offend the living) although I would probably give a listen, anyway). I hope that you continue your work. Thanks.

    • Thanks for that Mike. I certainly do hope to continue doing this work. If I am unable to find the means to get back into intensive research then I will continue writing op-ed type stuff and doing commentaries. I really appreciate your positive feedback.

    • Thanks Erich. I have been wanting to and meaning to read Exterminate All the Brutes and also Lindqvist’s book on the history of bombing. A book published at roughly the same time which may interest you is Markusen and Kopf’s The Holocaust and Strategic Bombing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s